AmeriGuard protective Services & The Executive Protection Training Institute
Presents:
An intensive 2 Day Training Seminar on: Executive Protection Officers Training (Basic)
This comprehensive 2 day seminar on Executive Protection Tactics & Techniques is designed as both an introductory class to those wishing to enter the exciting field of Executive Security or as a refresher course for those already in this rewarding career choice.
This seminar is designed to teach you the proper procedures and technigues to follow when conducting close protection details in areas where prudish legal systems abound, such as the US. A strong emphasis on legal liability and accountability is presented throughout all aspects of this training.
Attendees will learn the basic aspects of:
How to Work a Protection Detail/How to use Close Cover Travel Patterns.
Team Dynamics/Team Member Responsibility/Conflict Avoidance
Dignitary Escorts/Defensive Maneuvers/Defensive Tactics
Objectives and Overview of Executive Protection Services
Weapons Retention/Disarming/Takedown Tactics
Etiquette & Protocol/Legal Liability
Cover & Evacuation Maneuvers
Defensive Tactics for the Protection Officer
The Dynamics of Explosives/IED's
Use of Force
Target Hardening & the importance of Information Security
Advance Surveys/Route Planning
This is an intensive Hands-On Training Seminar. Classroom training will be followed by student participation in: Defensive Tactics, Scenario/Simulation and Role Playing for the Executive Protection Professional. Guest speakers TBA.
A class workbook, checklists, and handouts will be distributed at the beginning of the first session only. A certificate of attendance will be awarded at the successful completion of the seminar. Cost of this seminar is $550.00 US with discounts for Police, Military & groups of five or more.
Class size is limited and you must confirm your placement in this class by contacting Gerald Hagerty at: iprotectu@att.net for selection & class assignment. For more information please log onto our website at: www.eptraininginstitute.com
All training is done by certified law enforcement officers and current Protection Specialist in their respective fields.
Monday, May 14, 2007
Friday, January 26, 2007
OSHA COMPLIANT TRAINING
To: Construction Site Security Workers (Wednesday 1/31/07 & 2/7/07)
Our Affiliate Company, PSPS Legal Support Services Inc. has agreed to arrange for 10 Hour OSHA Safety Compliance Training for Security Officers working at Construction Sites.
This is now state mandated training for all site workers.
This is State Certified training for MA., CT., & RI. In addition to the 10 hours classroom training this course requires the student to also complete an additional two hours of home study. For more information please contact me by cell or email at iprotectu@att.net
Our Affiliate Company, PSPS Legal Support Services Inc. has agreed to arrange for 10 Hour OSHA Safety Compliance Training for Security Officers working at Construction Sites.
This is now state mandated training for all site workers.
This is State Certified training for MA., CT., & RI. In addition to the 10 hours classroom training this course requires the student to also complete an additional two hours of home study. For more information please contact me by cell or email at iprotectu@att.net
Monday, January 15, 2007
New Clients
Please post recent incidents of merit as a form of pass-on information here:
DAILY INCIDENTS FOR AmeriGuard Protective Services
DAILY INCIDENTS FOR AmeriGuard Protective Services
Congratulations to our long time associate Adam Dezso on his upcoming nuptuals. We wish you and your fianc'e the best.
AmeriGuard Protective Services is thankful to the following new clients for their support and confidence in our abilities:
VSS
East Boston Saving Bank
WES Construction Corp.
P.A.C.E. Travel Services
Towne Air Frieght
The Harvard Club
The State Room
Cinestar Pictures
Mirror Films
Gruenger Travel Group
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Cellular Use by Protection Officers
Problem:
Once again, it has been brought to our attention that certain Protection Officers in the industry have resorted to (what we will call ) the modern day version of "Romancing the Stone". To wit: extensively using a cell phone while on duty.
This complaint/problem has come up in the past from clients in a wide range of industries. Their consternation with it is that they feel that they are not getting their moneys worth from security officers who are diverting their attention away from the clients needs (and their own surroundings) so that the officer can carry on his personal business over a cellular device.
The majority of these conversations seems to be between the officers and their significant others, hence the term "Romancing the Stone. Ha Ha.
(P.S. the use of blue tooth ear pieces doesn't fool anybody and if you have ever driven behind some clown swerving all over the place only to pass them and see a cellphone stuck to their face, well this is the same way the client is viewing your services. ) By the way the clown driving the car thinks he is doing a fine job too.
Well it is not funny, and I whole-heartedly agree with the clients. This is an image industry and as such, people have a tendency to judge the whole industry by the behavior of a few.
Believe me, it is hard enough trying to obtain higher paying contracts (so the officers can prosper) only to hear; why do you need more money is their cell bills getting too high?
Again: this is an image industry you have to be aware and be capable. Having one hand (or your attention) compromised by a non-essential conversation is negligent behavior. (again: even with an ear-piece)
Not only is this an image industry, it is the protection industry and not only does your own life depend on you being "totally" aware of your surroundings but so do the lives of our clients and the general public.
The abuse of cell phones while on duty has become such a widespread problem that I have taken the time to set out a plan that I believe will help polish the industry's image starting with my own back yard.
The way I look at it is this if you are given an assignment and you are on the cell phone and:
a) it is not the client or his staff transferring work related info to you
or
b) it is not your supervisor or superior on the phone and it is not a work/safety issue
then
Apparently you are not "on" your assignment for that duration now are you.
SOLUTION
Fortunately, most of our protection clients use CCTV therefore it is easy to document our officers performance. So if one of our clients or their staff claims that a protection officer is on the cell too much it will be easy to calculate the time spent "off assignment" and dock the officers pay and credit it back to the client, Get It.
Not only will the client benefit from this but so will your fellow protection officers and the industry itself.
Oh ya, the people who pay you, do not benefit from this payback plan at all so I would not count on your pay being docked too many times before you find yourself in another type of employment.
I am really looking forward to hearing any thoughts you might have on this topic.
G. Hagerty
Once again, it has been brought to our attention that certain Protection Officers in the industry have resorted to (what we will call ) the modern day version of "Romancing the Stone". To wit: extensively using a cell phone while on duty.
This complaint/problem has come up in the past from clients in a wide range of industries. Their consternation with it is that they feel that they are not getting their moneys worth from security officers who are diverting their attention away from the clients needs (and their own surroundings) so that the officer can carry on his personal business over a cellular device.
The majority of these conversations seems to be between the officers and their significant others, hence the term "Romancing the Stone. Ha Ha.
(P.S. the use of blue tooth ear pieces doesn't fool anybody and if you have ever driven behind some clown swerving all over the place only to pass them and see a cellphone stuck to their face, well this is the same way the client is viewing your services. ) By the way the clown driving the car thinks he is doing a fine job too.
Well it is not funny, and I whole-heartedly agree with the clients. This is an image industry and as such, people have a tendency to judge the whole industry by the behavior of a few.
Believe me, it is hard enough trying to obtain higher paying contracts (so the officers can prosper) only to hear; why do you need more money is their cell bills getting too high?
Again: this is an image industry you have to be aware and be capable. Having one hand (or your attention) compromised by a non-essential conversation is negligent behavior. (again: even with an ear-piece)
Not only is this an image industry, it is the protection industry and not only does your own life depend on you being "totally" aware of your surroundings but so do the lives of our clients and the general public.
The abuse of cell phones while on duty has become such a widespread problem that I have taken the time to set out a plan that I believe will help polish the industry's image starting with my own back yard.
The way I look at it is this if you are given an assignment and you are on the cell phone and:
a) it is not the client or his staff transferring work related info to you
or
b) it is not your supervisor or superior on the phone and it is not a work/safety issue
then
Apparently you are not "on" your assignment for that duration now are you.
SOLUTION
Fortunately, most of our protection clients use CCTV therefore it is easy to document our officers performance. So if one of our clients or their staff claims that a protection officer is on the cell too much it will be easy to calculate the time spent "off assignment" and dock the officers pay and credit it back to the client, Get It.
Not only will the client benefit from this but so will your fellow protection officers and the industry itself.
Oh ya, the people who pay you, do not benefit from this payback plan at all so I would not count on your pay being docked too many times before you find yourself in another type of employment.
I am really looking forward to hearing any thoughts you might have on this topic.
G. Hagerty
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
